|
The Top 20 |
|
Overall Rank |
College |
Composite Score |
|
1 |
IIT Kanpur |
77.5 |
|
2 |
IIT Bombay |
75.6 |
|
3 |
IIT Madras |
73.8 |
|
4 |
IIT Kharagpur |
73.1 |
|
5 |
Institute of Technology, Banaras
Hindu University, Varanasi |
72 |
|
6 |
IIT Guwahati |
71.6 |
|
7 |
NIT Warangal |
70 |
|
8 |
NIT Trichy |
67.6 |
|
9 |
Thapar Institute of Engineering
& Technology, Patiala |
66.7 |
|
10 |
Netaji Subhas Institute of
Technology (DIT), New Delhi |
64.5 |
|
11 |
NIT Suratkal |
64.2 |
|
12 |
Motilal Nehru National Institute
of Technology, Allahabad |
62.1 |
|
13 |
Punjab Engineering College,
Chandigadh |
60.3 |
|
14 |
International Institute of
Information Technology, Hyderabad |
60.2 |
|
15 |
Birla Institute of Technology &
Science, Pilani |
59.9 |
|
16 |
IIT Roorkee |
59.2 |
|
17 |
NIT Rourkela |
58.5 |
|
18 |
NIT Kurukshetra |
57.5 |
|
19 |
Indian Institute of information
Technology, Allahabad |
57.1 |
|
20 |
Delhi College of Engineering,
New Delhi |
57.1 |
Table B: 2005 Top 5 on
Parameters
|
The Top 5 On
Parameters |
|
Placement |
|
Rank |
College |
Score |
|
1 |
IIT Chennai |
31.2 |
|
2 |
IIT Kanpur |
31 |
|
3 |
NIT Suratkal |
27.1 |
|
4 |
NIT Warangal |
26.4 |
|
5 |
Netaji Subhas Institute of
Technology (DIT), New Delhi |
25.9 |
|
|
Intellectual Capital |
|
Rank |
College |
Score |
|
1 |
IT-BHU, Varanasi |
11.8 |
|
2 |
IIT Guwahati |
9.3 |
|
3 |
Thapar Institute of
Engineering & Technology, Patiala |
8.3 |
|
4 |
IIT Bombay |
8.2 |
|
5 |
IIT Kharagpur |
8.2 |
|
|
Infrastructure |
|
Rank |
College |
Score |
|
1 |
IIT Kanpur |
14.8 |
|
2 |
IIT Bombay |
14.8 |
|
3 |
IIT Kharagpur |
14.8 |
|
4 |
IIT Guwahati |
14.8 |
|
5 |
Krishna Institute of
Engineering And Technology, Ghaziabad |
14.8 |
|
|
Industry
Interface |
|
Rank |
College |
Score |
|
1 |
IIT Kharagpur |
3.2 |
|
2 |
IIT Bombay |
3.1 |
|
3 |
NIT Trichy |
2.4 |
|
4 |
Jadavpur University,
Calcutta |
1.8 |
|
5 |
IT-BHU, Varanasi |
1.6 |
|
Table C: 2005 The
Perception Factor
|
The
Perception Factor |
|
Rank |
College |
Score |
|
1 |
IIT Kanpur |
25 |
|
2 |
IIT Bombay |
25 |
|
3 |
IIT Chennai |
24.5 |
|
4 |
IIT Kharagpur |
24.5 |
|
5 |
IT-BHU, Varanasi |
22.4 |
|
According to the HR
heads' perception, IIT Kanpur and IIT Bombay topped the
list |
|
Table D: 2005 Performance
region-wise
|
How They
Stack Up |
|
N o r t h |
|
S No |
College |
Overall
Rank |
|
1 |
IIT Kanpur |
1 |
|
2 |
IT-BHU, Varanasi |
5 |
|
3 |
Thapar Institute of Engg &
Technology, Patiala |
9 |
|
4 |
Netaji Subhash Institute of
Technology, New Delhi |
10 |
|
5 |
MN-NIT, Allahabad |
12 |
|
S o u t h |
|
1 |
IIT Madras |
3 |
|
2 |
NIT Warangal |
7 |
|
3 |
NIT Trichy |
8 |
|
4 |
NIT Suratkal |
11 |
|
5 |
IIIT Hyderabad |
14 |
|
E a s t |
|
1 |
IIT Kharagpur |
4 |
|
2 |
IIT Guwahati |
6 |
|
3 |
NIT Rourkela |
17 |
|
4 |
Jadavpur University,
Calcutta |
25 |
|
5 |
SIT Kolkata (Formerly IIIT) |
27 |
|
W e s t |
|
1 |
IIT Bombay |
2 |
|
2 |
Government College of
Engineering, Pune |
24 |
|
3 |
Sardar Patel College of
Engineering, Bombay |
26 |
|
4 |
International Institute of
Information Technology, Pune |
34 |
|
5 |
Bharatiya Vidyapeeth's
College of Engineering, Bombay |
42 |
|
In India, there are two popular
ranking surveys for engineering colleges: one is by India
Today magazine and other by Dataquest magazine.
India Today survey
The magazine has been conducting
such surveys for the last several years. This year, the survey
was carried out in association with A C Nielsen ORG-MARG.
The ranking shows top 10
engineering colleges in the India, along with the rankings in
the field of business management, medicine, commerce, science,
law and arts.
The survey takes into account
institute's infrastructure, research, admitted student quality,
placement statistics, perception among academic and
industrialists, etc.
Dataquest survey
The survey, done for technical
schools only, was conducted for the first time this year in
India by this magazine. It was done in collaboration with
International Data Corporation and the National Association of
Software and Service Companies.
IDC is a world leader in the
market research for information technology and software
industries. Nasscom is India's most powerful IT industry
association -- which even the country's Planning Commission
consults for IT and software-related forecast and planning.
The survey has a no-nonsense
approach, as the study claims: "The Dataquest-IDC-Nasscom survey
findings are most likely to send some of the Tier-I schools into
a tizzy. However, instead of breathing fire down our necks,
these institutes would do well to ponder a little on where
exactly they have erred."
The survey takes into account the
infrastructure of the college, placement scenario, intellectual
capital (faculty quality and strength, research, et cetera),
interface with industries and perception of recruiters.
How reliable are these
surveys?
With different surveys showing
different rankings for the same college, the common man asks the
question: which of the surveys to believe?
Well, the answer is that there is
no clear answer.
Different surveys take different
criteria, ask different questions for the same criterion and
give different weightage while arriving at a composite score for
determining overall rankings.
Hence all these surveys are
correct up to some extent in their own way.
A good survey will not be afraid
of the public criticism and the most popular colleges need not
be the best in the ranking. The list should not be the same year
after year and, at the same time, there should not be any
drastic changes in rankings at each year. Good examples are
college rankings in the United States by magazines such as
Business Week and US News & World Report.
Each survey has its own drawbacks
of some kind. For example, the India Today survey,
although based on acceptable criteria, mostly reserves the top
six to seven slots for a group of institutes, while the next
three to four ranks fluctuate every year.
It may be advisable for it to
publish the expanded list, such as top 20 overall ranks and
provide rankings under different criteria/sub-categories.
On the other hand, the
Dataquest survey is geared towards requirements of the IT
and software industry.
Moreover, students need not
depend solely on college rankings for the selection of a
college. Other factors beyond rankings are also to be
considered. Such as quality of study, selecting proper branch,
proximity to home, hostel facilities, etc. They should visit the
campus to get first-hand information and also find out from
their friends who have studied there.
In conclusion
The surveys have a welcome move
of also including colleges which do not have a favourable public
perception. Bold surveys give the masses a second chance to know
about the good colleges unknown to them so far.
This is an important step since
the mass media in India is saturated with success stories of
only 1 per cent of the total of 1,200 engineering colleges,
giving a distorted vision for many and false pride for some. It
is expected that the coming years, the surveys will be more
refined.
In such a scenario, beacons of
college rankings from the lighthouse of magazines will guide the
boatload of applicants to the islands of academic excellence.
Yogesh Upadhyaya is a
chemical engineering graduate from IT-BHU and an MS (chemical
engineering) from Rutgers University, New Jersey. Arvind Gupta,
also an alumnus of IT-BHU, is CEO of e-Enable Technologies, New
Delhi.
The Dataquest survey rankings are published by the kind
permission of Dataquest , a CyberMedia publication. |